🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam ruling, the highest judicial body permitted Texas to use a newly configured congressional map that could add as many as five additional GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 ruling, issued on Thursday, grants a appeal by the state to set aside a lower court's injunction that had struck down the new map in November.

Justices' Rationale

The lower court improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating much confusion and disturbing the delicate equilibrium in elections, the order stated in explaining its action.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had likely grouped voters based on their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the boundaries. It had instructed the state to use the maps drawn after the 2020 census for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

In a strongly worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's decision. She contended that it disregarded the work of the lower court, noting that its ruling was written by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a violation of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Fight

The ruling comes amid a nationwide battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to protect a narrow Republican hold. Usually, redistricting takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a chain reaction among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that could add several more Republican-leaning seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have countered with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State AG praised the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he stated.

On the other hand, opposition party representatives lamented the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major party election organization.

A top House figure said the court had once again eroded its legitimacy by approving a racially gerrymandered map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he stated.