🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage is likely the optimal choice for a audacious horror film about the biblical figure, but not for the reasons some fans may think. Actually, the star doesn't even portray the central religious figure in the new film: the part he plays is referred to only as a craftsman. Cage is framed as a father figure of this tale, striving to keep his beliefs as the teenage character (acted by Noah Jupe), their teenage foster child, starts to display divine powers. Why it’s difficult to imagine any other leading star playing this part is that while his character becomes burdened with numerous difficulties, Nicolas Cage looks almost moving certain that the dark, somber feature is deserving of his effort.

Cage's Current Career Choices

Nicolas Cage has been allocating that time more judiciously in recent years. He still makes more movies than most regular audiences may ever watch — for example, did you know that he has filmed three distinct frontier films recently? — but he also mixes in prestige A24/Neon gigs such as Dream Scenario, Pig, and a further title. This new film seems like a similar project, as it’s genre-adjacent, potentially provocative, and approaches a exaggerated premise in a earnest manner.

Movie's Premise and Direction

Regrettably, writer-director Lotfy Nathan fails to repay viewer engagement. The film begins with a engagingly rootless setting, marketed as inspired by an unknown scripture concerning the youthful days of the messiah. Cage's character, The Mother, and their son move constantly, afraid of religious persecution or distrust regarding their son's mysterious gifts. “Disaster trails us,” Cage sadly observes. It goes on as dark forces attack the household in their latest settlement, initiating with that traditional religious challenge for The Boy.

At times, this production mirrors an Exorcist-style supernatural thriller, except that none of the main figures are clearly inhabited. On the contrary, they are progressively isolated from each other, as these entities infect a resident female (the actress, named an outsider) who the son connects to, and presents everyone troubling visions of a grim future. Cage's role notably struggles with his role within the plot, at times chastising the son who mystifies him.

Discussion and Care

This material is prone to stir disagreement, and the director treats it with much delicacy — excessive, perhaps. The idea of a young man confronted with his future martyrdom and lured by unknown powers is indeed scary, but the filmmaker might be wary of seeming gratuitous and eager to telegraph his intentions, thus he frequently falls back on gloomily threatening filming. The figures constantly ponder — the singer-actress, who demonstrated real promise in the 2024 Crow remake, surprisingly — yields her acting to her character's costume, at times punctuated by several disturbing frightening scenes.

The Star's Performance and Film's Weaknesses

Meanwhile, Cage toy with exactly the kind of overacting that his ironic fans might be looking for. There is a moment (also included) in previews in which Cage erupts and screams “I’ve lost my faith!” If that kind of dramatic explosion is part of your Jesus-themed horror movie, perhaps a more openly absurd method would take better advantage of the actor's readiness to exaggerate as required. Instead, the film is closer to the less successful low-budget films he starred in through much of the last decade — apart from the B-movies so much as the dramas and ghost stories that often seem intriguing, and frequently include several notable memorable scenes, but ultimately feel like, frankly, inexpensive direct-to-consumer content.

Truthfully, several of these, while less ambitious, were more watchable overall. This is when I need to break my own dogma, not faith-based but work-oriented: Years back, a respected mentor convinced me to remove adjectives like “tedious” or “uninteresting” from my film-criticism vocabulary. These phrases communicate minimal except a subjective and broadly stated restlessness, avoiding the task of vibrantly communicating the mental and feeling of seeing a particular movie. It's hard to convey tedium without sounding boring oneself. It's just as unclear as calling a movie “engaging.” “Explain further,” in other words.

However, I admit, I grew weary throughout The Carpenter’s Son. On the positive side, it’s a devotional type of stultification, not due to this movie is lecturing, but since it demands a type of obedient endurance to sit through it. After a while in the beginning, the film locks into a cyclic tempo of simmering anguish, and does not